Regulation

Spat between SPGA and Play’n GO continues over sweepstakes argument

Trade group’s LinkedIn post cites small regulator service, but Play’n GO stands by its regulated market commitment.

548
playn go logo on games background

Tensions between the Social & Promotional Games Association (SPGA) and slot game developer Play’n GO have escalated following fresh allegations about the latter’s distribution practices. On LinkedIn, SPGA accused Play’n GO of hypocrisy, referencing a report from Compliance+More—a small, independent service focused on gaming regulation—which claimed that Play’n GO’s games are available on unlicensed gambling sites targeting users in Germany and the Netherlands.

Interesting timing

The timing of these allegations is notable, coinciding with Play’n GO’s recent decision to not list its games on sweepstakes platforms.

This initially got the back up of the SPGA, who took offense to Play’n GO’s decision to make this announcement about their unwillingness to get involved in Sweeps. They then followed up by echoing the reports made by Compliance+More about black market activity.

SPGA’s post on LinkedIn stated:

Just last month, Play’n GO proudly soapboxed us all, proclaiming they’d ‘never support unregulated markets.

Today, we learned…they already do.”

The group went on to criticise Play’n GO for attacking legal sweepstakes games while allegedly benefiting from distribution via offshore black market operators.

Play’n GO denies

Play’n GO has firmly denied any wrongdoing, dismissing the allegations as unsubstantiated and emphasising that its commitment to regulated markets remains absolute.

The company had previously stated:

Our commitment to regulated markets is absolute. We will never supply our games to sweepstakes casinos.

Play’n GO also pointed out that any presence of its games on unlicensed sites is likely due to unauthorised third-party resellers and minimal traffic.

Industry observers note that both SPGA and Compliance+More are relatively minor players in the wider gaming landscape. The allegations, while serious, remain just that—allegations—and have not been independently verified by major regulatory bodies. The spat highlights ongoing debates within the industry about the enforcement of digital gaming regulations and the challenges of maintaining integrity in a rapidly evolving market.

For now, the controversy appears to be a war of words between a trade group and a major slot developer, with no clear resolution in sight. The incident underscores the complexities of navigating online gaming’s regulatory grey areas, especially as companies like Play’n GO seek to distance themselves from certain types of platforms while facing scrutiny from industry watchdogs

    newsletter
    Sign up for our mailing list today and get all the latest slots
    delivered to your inbox for free. 18+ Gamble Responsibly

    Related Articles

    Google to update advertising policy for gambling products

    Google will require gambling and games advertisers to meet the ‘good policy...

    Published document suggests UKGC license fee hikes being considered

    A consultation proposing substantial increases to UK gambling operator licence fees has...

    Flutter’s Paddy Power Betfair to pay £2m after UKGC ruling

    Flutter’s Paddy Power Betfair must pay £2m after a ruling by the...

    Platinum Gaming penalised £10m for UKGC compliance breaches

    The UK Gambling Commission has imposed a £10 million penalty on Platinum...